TL;DR
Get comfort and recovery gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Tiny Buddha published a first-person essay about a psychologist who considered telling an old friend about a chronic health issue, then did not. The writer distinguishes excuses that masked avoidance from a genuine concern about privacy and losing control of how others tell his story.
Tiny Buddha published a first-person essay in which a psychologist describes deciding whether to tell an old friend about a chronic health issue and ultimately not sharing it. The account separates excuses that helped the writer avoid an uncomfortable conversation from a privacy concern he considered legitimate: losing control of how others might discuss his health.
The writer recounts messaging a former graduate-school friend late at night after work, while his wife was preparing for bed and their children were asleep. Once the usual updates about family and work ran out, he considered telling her about a chronic health problem and the previous year. He says the condition was not something he usually concealed from close friends, but he was unsure about sharing it with someone more distant.
He identifies three thoughts that made it easier to hold back: it was late, the friend had said she was tired, and she did not tell him about every illness she faced. He recognizes the last thought as keeping score, rather than consideration for his friend. He describes the first two as concern-shaped reasons that later lost force: the following morning, when the hour and her tiredness were no longer relevant, he still did not write to her.
A separate concern remained: he did not want the health information to become a story told by other people, in language he could not shape, or to become the main thing an acquaintance remembered about him. His daughter woke from a bad dream and interrupted his deliberation. The next day’s routine carried on, and he did not return to the conversation. He says he still has not told the friend, and leaves open whether he ever will.
The essay’s central distinction is between choosing not to disclose and allowing avoidance to make the choice by default. The writer does not argue that people owe others personal information. Instead, he describes noticing that his decision had been interrupted rather than resolved, and that reasons presented as concern for his friend did not explain why he stayed silent later.
That distinction matters to readers weighing what to share about health, family or other private experiences. The account presents vulnerability not as a duty to disclose, but as a choice shaped by trust, timing and control over personal information. It also suggests that a person can recognize an avoidance pattern without that awareness automatically changing the decision.
Popular right now
KitchenAid Artisan Series 5-Quart Tilt-Head Stand Mixer, Dried Rose (KSM150PS)
Vitamix 5200 Professional-Grade Blender, 64 oz. Container, Black
Apple AirPods Pro 3 Wireless Earbuds with Active Noise Cancellation
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Late-Night Conversation
The source is a personal essay, not a research study or clinical report. Its evidence is the writer’s account of one conversation and his reflections afterward. The writer identifies himself as a psychologist and says both he and the friend are psychologists, but the essay does not present their exchange as a professional consultation.
At the start of the essay, the writer quotes Brené Brown: “Vulnerability minus boundaries is not vulnerability.” He uses the idea of boundaries to frame his concern that disclosure to a less-close friend could travel beyond the conversation. The essay offers his interpretation of that particular decision; it does not establish that the same motives apply to other people or relationships.
““Classic avoidance, dressed up as consideration.””
— The writer, in the Tiny Buddha essay
What the Writer Has Not Decided
The essay does not say whether the writer later contacted his friend or intends to tell her. He says he still has not shared the information and that he may never do so. The source also does not identify the health condition, explain its effects, or provide a publication date.
Beyond this personal account, the essay does not establish how common these reasons for withholding information are. It is not a survey, study or report on vulnerability; its conclusions are limited to the writer’s own reflections.
No Further Disclosure Reported
The writer does not announce a planned conversation or another step. His stated next point is unresolved: he may tell the friend in the future, or he may decide that keeping the information private is right for him. The essay ends with that uncertainty rather than presenting disclosure as an outcome readers should expect.
Key Questions
What happened in the essay?
A writer considered telling an old friend about a chronic health issue during a late-night message exchange, but did not share it. He later reflected on which reasons were excuses and which concern involved privacy.
Did the writer eventually tell his friend?
No disclosure is reported. The writer says he still has not told her and is unsure whether he ever will.
What excuses did the writer identify?
He thought it was too late, that his friend was tired, and that she did not share every illness she experienced. He later described the last thought as keeping score; the first two did not explain his continued silence after the night had passed.
Why did he consider privacy a separate concern?
He worried that others might discuss his health in his absence or that the condition could become the main thing a more distant acquaintance associated with him. He viewed control over his personal story as a legitimate reason to be selective.
Source: rss
